The Myth of the Positivity Ratio: Why Emotions Can't Be Counted
Written on
Understanding the Positivity Ratio
The realm of Positive Psychology has intrigued many individuals. Yet, some of its assertions have been found to be exaggerated. A notable claim is the supposed existence of a numerical ‘positivity ratio’ that differentiates thriving individuals from those who struggle.
This proposed ratio suggests that maintaining three positive emotions for every negative one will lead to flourishing and resilience. It sounds appealing—who wouldn’t want that? However, this notion has not been substantiated.
Barbara Fredrickson, a key figure in positive psychology and the creator of the Broaden and Build theory, popularized this concept. Her theory posits that negative emotions tend to be constraining and provoke specific responses that limit our choices. For instance, when feeling fearful, our instinct may be to withdraw or escape. This aligns with the idea that many negative feelings serve as alarms for survival.
In contrast, positive emotions do not compel immediate actions but rather shape our thinking, which in turn affects our behaviors. Positive feelings can broaden our thought processes and actions, encouraging us to explore new possibilities.
Are Positive Emotions Beneficial?
Certainly, positive emotions are valuable. However, Fredrickson proposed that a 3-to-1 positivity ratio was a critical threshold. While it’s tempting to embrace this idea, empirical evidence supporting it is lacking. Why is that?
The answer is straightforward: not all emotions carry the same weight. For instance, if I were to maintain an emotional scorecard, winning the lottery might add one point to my positive tally, while finding an old sock could also add one. Clearly, discovering a lost sock can evoke more joy than winning a lottery ticket on any given day.
This example illustrates the challenge of measuring the significance of the vast spectrum of emotions—both positive and negative. Without a way to quantify them, establishing a meaningful positivity ratio becomes impossible.
Yet, there’s still value in the concept of positivity.
The Power of Positive Thinking
Despite our inability to quantify a positivity ratio, the idea remains beneficial. Extensive literature exists on the advantages of positive thinking, emphasizing the need to transition from a critical and judgmental mindset to one that is open and accepting.
When we alter our perspective, we instigate changes in our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
This process fundamentally alters our engagement with the world. There may be no definitive emotional ratio, but there are certainly healthier and unhealthier approaches to living, which can facilitate personal growth and new experiences.
This is where Fredrickson’s Broaden and Build theory comes into play. By leaning towards positivity, we typically witness an increase in both the quality and quantity of our positive emotions. This shift enables us to focus on reinforcing the positive aspects of our lives rather than dwelling on the negative. Consequently, we can foster upward spirals of improvement rather than downward cycles.
Ultimately, the pursuit of a mythical positivity ratio pales in comparison to the real, lived experience of improving our lives.
James McGinley, PhD is a professor, author, certified life coach, and licensed counselor.
Books/Blog — Facebook — Instagram — YouTube, The Coping Expert
The first video, “Barbara Fredrickson: The Positivity Ratio,” delves into the concept of positive emotions and how they influence our lives, exploring both the benefits and limitations of the positivity ratio.
The second video, “Barbara Fredrickson The Positivity Ratio,” further examines the implications of maintaining a positivity ratio in our emotional lives and how it affects our overall well-being.