Chapter 1: The Digital Shift

As I reflect on my experiences over the years, it's becoming increasingly clear how profoundly technology is transforming our lives—from the way we communicate to our understanding of time itself. This digital landscape is reshaping our very essence.

Instead of picking up the phone to connect with childhood friends, we now rely on social media platforms, often resorting to memes for expression rather than lengthy messages. Our interactions frequently revolve around sharing amusing or intriguing videos.

The concept of idle time has nearly vanished. My once-uneventful 45-minute commute, filled merely with the radio, has evolved into an opportunity for learning through podcasts or audiobooks played at accelerated speeds. Many people utilize these moments to catch up on streaming shows or current events.

These changes may seem monumental. However, while watching Lex Fridman interview Elon Musk, I grasped that we are on the brink of a technological revolution. Their discussion centered on Musk’s venture, Neuralink.

Recently, Neuralink successfully implanted a device in the brain of a paralyzed test subject, allowing him to control devices through thought via Bluetooth, granting him newfound independence.

Musk refers to this device as "Telepathy," believing that as more circuits are integrated, it will endow humans with telepathic-like capabilities. Beyond merely assisting those with disabilities, it could enable anyone to communicate at speeds vastly superior to current methods. Musk envisions that this advancement will expand our biological capacities, helping us keep pace with artificial intelligence. The rapid data transmission could fundamentally alter our nature, with hundreds of thousands expected to have Neuralink enhancements within the next decade or so.

Yet, how do we manage such radical transformations? A philosopher of technology can guide us in recognizing these changes. Strikingly, many of the phenomena we observe today were anticipated by thinkers in the 1960s.

Understanding the Medium: McLuhan's Insights

Marshall McLuhan, a prominent philosopher and director of the Centre for Culture and Technology at the University of Toronto, specialized in electronic media. His research explored the impact of television and digital communication on human culture, and he himself became a media figure during the 1960s.

His last book, The Medium Is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects, gained significant popularity, selling around a million copies.

In a BBC interview from the 1960s, McLuhan noted that tools, from wheels to mechanical devices, have always served as extensions of the human body. However, he emphasized that "electromagnetism is an extension of our nervous system, not merely an extension of our bodies."

The transition from mechanical to electronic systems marked a pivotal shift for humanity. McLuhan explained that this shift resulted in an immense increase in the volume of information being processed. He stated:

"One of the effects of switching over to circuitry from mechanical moving parts and wheels, is an enormous increase of the amount of information that is moving. You cannot cope with massive amounts of information moving in the old fragmentary classified patterns."

With this influx of data, the ability to recognize patterns has become crucial (today, we rely on algorithms for this). McLuhan also highlighted the significance of data compression to manage overwhelming information levels.

Elon Musk, in his conversation with Fridman, pointed out that the memes we frequently share are, in essence, forms of data compression, encapsulating multiple meanings in simple visuals.

In his work, Understanding Media, McLuhan argued that our current focus often leans excessively toward the specific meanings of messages, while neglecting the medium through which they are delivered. This realization led to his famous assertion: "The medium is the message." His final book cleverly plays on this concept.

McLuhan believed that the technology used to transmit messages alters society in ways we may not recognize until long after the changes have occurred. This transformation can influence culture, values, religion, and history without our awareness.

The evolution of media can create entirely new human environments. For example, in 2010, an estimated 2 zettabytes (or 2 trillion gigabytes) of data were generated, consumed, and replicated. By 2025, this figure is projected to rise to 181 zettabytes.

Our smartphones have become extensions of our minds. How often do we search the web in the midst of a conversation to recall a particular fact? When was the last time you consulted a physical map? Digital technology has infiltrated every aspect of our lives, occupying our "idle time," integrating into our attire, and even monitoring our doorsteps.

The rapid pace of our world has prompted companies like Neuralink to explore brain implants to help us keep up. If, as McLuhan suggests, the medium is destined to transform us unnoticed, how can we preserve our humanity before we devolve into mere memes?

Chapter 2: Embracing Perspective with Lewis

C.S. Lewis offers a thought-provoking strategy for this dilemma. In his words:

"The scholar that has lived in many times is…in some degree immune from the great cataract of nonsense that pours from the press and the microphone of his own age." — C.S. Lewis, Learning In War Time

In 1939, as World War II loomed, Lewis and his colleagues at Oxford faced a critical decision: should education continue during such turmoil? Many believed the college should suspend operations.

Lewis argued passionately for the continuation of education, even amidst chaos. He acknowledged the seeming futility of this stance, likening it to "fiddling while Rome burns." However, he believed that their turbulent time was not unique and should be viewed in a broader context.

In his address, Learning In War Time, Lewis noted that no era is without its challenges, and there has always been a reason to delay cultural pursuits. He stated:

"Plausible reasons have never been lacking for putting off all merely cultural activities until some imminent danger has been averted or some crying injustice put right. But humanity long ago chose to neglect those plausible reasons. They wanted knowledge and beauty now, and would not wait for the suitable moment that never comes."

Lewis argued that while insects may focus solely on survival, humans are capable of much more. We can derive mathematical principles in besieged cities, debate the essence of life in prison cells, and even engage in sports discussions en route to battle. Even the Spartans groomed themselves at Thermopylae.

Lewis’s extensive knowledge of history and philosophy provided him with invaluable perspective. He believed that "intimate knowledge of the past" serves as a compass, guiding us away from the blindness of our contemporary circumstances. Those who traverse through time will not be "deceived" by the prevailing voices of the present.

This perspective is increasingly vital in our fast-paced digital age, characterized by memes and rapid information flow. With this understanding, let us synthesize our insights.

Anchoring Ourselves Amidst the Digital Tsunami

Göbekli Tepe, a 12,000-year-old archaeological site in Turkey, is often regarded as the world's first temple. Constructed by hunter-gatherers, it features stone circles with some pillars weighing up to 20 tons.

This site emerged during a period of significant transformation, transitioning humanity from the Old Stone Age to the Neolithic Age. Societies shifted from nomadic lifestyles to settled communities, igniting the Neolithic revolution, which brought forth several fundamental developments that we now take for granted, including:

• Agriculture
• Writing
• Cities
• Religion and philosophy
• Governance, kingdoms, and nations

Martin B. Sweatman from the University of Edinburgh proposes that Göbekli Tepe may also represent an ancient calendar, capable of tracking lunar and solar cycles—a discovery that could predate other known calendars by millennia.

Thus, the Neolithic revolution not only introduced these advancements but also redefined our understanding of time itself. Clearly, we are not the only civilization navigating through profound disruptions.

Consequently, we need not succumb to the overwhelming tide of technology if we adopt certain strategies to stay afloat.

First, as McLuhan pointed out, the medium is the message. By stepping back to analyze not only the content we consume but also the technological containers we utilize, we can cultivate greater awareness. This endeavor will not be simple.

It is far easier to mindlessly click buttons presented to us—or even to consider clicking them with Neuralink. Yet, we bear the responsibility to actively safeguard our humanity as our world becomes increasingly digital.

Second, we must embrace the idea of living in multiple times, as Lewis suggested. The perspective gained from historical and philosophical knowledge can serve as a stabilizing anchor amidst the chaos of our fast-paced environment. Insights drawn from history about our ancestors' triumphs and failures can guide us.

To preserve our humanity as the digital age unfolds, we must exercise diligence and shift our perspective. We should view contemporary technology through McLuhan’s observant lens while connecting it to the past with the wisdom of Lewis.

For those interested in similar narratives, please consider subscribing to my mailing list. If you have a project in mind or simply wish to connect, feel free to visit my profile page.