# Addressing the Persistence of Cited Retractions in Scientific Literature
Written on
Chapter 1: The Issue of Cited Retractions
In the realm of scientific literature, flawed or even fraudulent studies can persist long after their official retraction. A notable case is that of anesthesiologist Scott Reuben, whose 25 retracted papers continued to be referenced five years post-retraction, posing a potential risk to patients. This raises a critical question: how can we halt the proliferation of scientific misinformation and mitigate its harmful effects?
Travis LaCroix, Anders Geil, and Cailin O’Connor delve into this issue through mathematical modeling. Their research indicates that many scholars remain unaware of retractions due to the social dynamics within their groups, leading them to continue citing these discredited papers.
To tackle the spread of scientific misinformation, effective communication is essential.
Section 1.1: The Role of Communication in Science
The implications of LaCroix and his colleagues' findings are significant for curbing the dissemination of misleading science. Their work suggests that designating a “central communicator” to disseminate retraction information could be beneficial. Platforms like Google Scholar and academic journals could serve this purpose, although they currently fall short.
Discussion: Why Retractions Are on the Rise
This video features Ivan Oransky, MD, discussing the increasing prevalence of retractions in scientific literature and the implications for scientific integrity.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Limitations of Current Practices
Google Scholar often lists retracted papers without linking to their retraction notices, allowing researchers to access these studies without being informed of their status. Furthermore, many academic journals neglect to verify the references in the papers they publish, which allows authors to continue citing these flawed works, perpetuating the cycle of misinformation.
Section 1.2: Proposed Solutions
The researchers advocate for changes to address these issues. They suggest that Google Scholar could enhance its functionality by linking retraction notices to the associated papers, ensuring that when researchers access a paper, they are also informed of its retraction. Additionally, they recommend that journals begin scrutinizing the references of submissions, informing authors about retracted citations and requiring corrections.
Chapter 2: Implementing Change
By adopting these measures, we can work towards reducing the spread of inaccurate and fraudulent research, thereby minimizing the damage it inflicts on the scientific community and public health.
Retraction in Academic Journals: Best Practices and Lessons Learned
This video explores best practices for handling retractions in academic journals, offering valuable insights into improving the integrity of scientific research.