Debunking Gender Stereotypes: Insights into Emotions and Gender
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Gender and Emotions
For anyone interested in this narrative but yet to subscribe to Medium Membership, here's my referral link. I genuinely hope it will help you grasp the value of this platform.
Source — one of my preferred sites — Helpful Professor
It's incredibly frustrating to hear that women are labeled as emotional while men are deemed rational, or that men are discouraged from crying while women are given the green light. These stereotypes are pervasive and tiresome, especially in our modern age. We’ve decoded our DNA, witnessed remarkable technological advancements, and yet outdated perceptions persist, such as the notion that a childless man garners little attention, while a woman without children is seen as having failed in some way.
Are we really still holding onto these views?
A recent study has gained traction, suggesting that men and women do not significantly differ in how they outwardly express emotions. But is that truly the conclusion of this research?
The Study Explored
Adrian Belts and her team at the University of Michigan conducted this study to investigate daily emotional differences between genders. The key takeaway from their findings was unexpected: there are no significant emotional variations between men and women on a day-to-day basis. Surprising, right?
Focus Points of the Research:
Researchers documented that both men and women experienced emotional shifts. After analyzing mood variations in both genders in three distinct ways, they found “minimal evidence for sex differences.” At times, “ovarian hormone fluctuation” has been cited as a rationale for excluding women from research.
Figure 1 from the study
Interpreting the Results
To clarify, the study did not focus on the essence of emotions themselves, such as whether men and women feel different emotions or express them uniquely. Rather, it examined the emotional fluctuations of 142 individuals over a span of 75 days. In simpler terms, the researchers investigated the emotional "ups and downs" and discovered that both men and women display comparable patterns of emotional variability.
Researchers noted that women have historically been excluded from scientific inquiries, largely due to the assumption that their emotional variability would complicate investigations into cognitive functions.
It's essential to highlight a significant point: women have often been omitted from numerous scientific studies because of the stereotype surrounding menstrual cycles. The presumption was that fluctuating hormones would affect emotions, and thus, women were excluded from studies focusing on cognition or personality, as their emotional states were thought to obscure results. This notion is frankly amusing.
Consequently, most research conducted over the years has predominantly involved men, but recent funding bodies like the National Institutes of Health have recognized this as incorrect. This study is among the first to declare that such exclusion has been scientifically flawed and ethically questionable since the 1990s.
The Gendered Lens on Emotions
The findings from the research illuminate the biases embedded within our perceptions of emotions. Society tends to interpret men's emotional expressions as passionate, while women’s displays are often seen as uncontrolled.
For instance, in my corporate experiences, I observed my former boss (a rather animated Italian) become visibly irate during meetings. His anger was perceived as assertiveness and passion; everyone paid close attention. Conversely, if a woman exhibited the same level of anger, she would often be labeled as hysterical or emotionally unstable, further entrenching the stereotype that women are irrational. Such biases can adversely affect women's career growth by undermining their credibility and devaluing their contributions.
Breaking Down Stereotypes
Recognizing that emotions are a universal human experience is crucial. We all navigate a spectrum of feelings, and attributing these solely to gender is both misleading and restrictive.
In a climate where gendered stereotypes regarding emotions endure, scientific studies like Adrian Belts' are vital. They remind us that emotions are intricate and universal, deserving of appreciation beyond outdated gender-based narratives. Instead of clinging to these antiquated views, we should celebrate the diversity of human emotions and strive for a more inclusive and empathetic society.
While there remains much to uncover regarding emotions and gender, it's encouraging to note that one stereotype has been effectively dismantled: men and women exhibit similar emotional fluctuations. This breakthrough paves the way for a deeper understanding of human emotions.
What shall we do with this knowledge?
I hope you found this piece enjoyable. I'd appreciate it if you could give me a clap, follow Parenteeny, and subscribe to my newsletter. Your support means everything to me!
The first video titled "The Three Big Myths About Emotions, Gender and Brains" by Lisa Feldman Barrett delves into prevalent misconceptions about how emotions relate to gender and brain function.
The second video "Exploding the stereotypes and myths of gendered emotions" by Pragya Agarwal challenges common stereotypes and presents insights to foster a deeper understanding of emotional expression across genders.