# Understanding the Nature of Intelligence and Consciousness
Written on
Chapter 1: The Quest for Understanding Intelligence
In embarking on this journey to explore a subject where I lack formal authority, I feel compelled to share my thoughts. Over the years, I have penned numerous articles on various topics, both professional and personal interests. Writing serves as a unique avenue for synthesizing knowledge; it’s one thing to claim understanding, and quite another to articulate it clearly to others. Crafting an explanation in a brief format is relatively straightforward, but developing a comprehensive blog post or lecture compels deep reflection on structure and evidence. This process ensures I remain grounded in reality rather than lost in oversimplified notions. My motivation is primarily for my growth, but I welcome you to join me.
Now, let's delve into the concept of consciousness—the C-word.
Everyone experiences those rare moments of introspection that prompt profound questions: Is my perception of blue identical to yours? What causes the sky to appear blue? Are extraterrestrial beings real? Is there an afterlife? What preceded the Big Bang? What is the universe's fate? What is the essence of existence?
Some inquiries can be addressed through scientific understanding. For instance, the sky's blue hue results from the scattering of shorter wavelengths of light, similar to oceanic color. Yet, many questions remain unanswered, and some may never be resolved.
Taking a step back from our individual realities can clarify simpler instances that lead to fundamental truths. Have you ever paused to consider the experience of a bat? Not just in terms of its flight, but whether it possesses an inner consciousness akin to ours. If reincarnation were a reality, would you retain self-awareness as a bat? What is sonar like compared to our senses of sight and sound? Bats are often discussed in relation to consciousness, particularly in Thomas Nagel's influential 1974 essay.
What is consciousness, really? The truth is, we don't have a definitive understanding. We know that consciousness diminishes during sleep and can even flicker when we're engrossed in thought or driving on autopilot. Most definitions incorporate aspects like self-awareness and the richness of our experiences—often referred to as "qualia." These include the distinct experience of the color red, for example. Our emotional states can be recognized, and we can reflect on the subtleties of these feelings. This ongoing narrative of our lives can be temporarily paused through meditation, allowing for a state devoid of self-awareness, where only raw sensory inputs exist.
In the video 4 Signs You're Not a Smart Person (Even Though You Think You Are), we explore common misconceptions about intelligence and the often-overlooked indicators of genuine understanding.
As we transition into sleep, whether dreaming or not, our conscious experience is interrupted, akin to a small death. Modern physics reveals that the particles that compose our bodies and brains are merely excitations within a field, constantly shifting. Essentially, we are patterns of energy, suggesting that the individual who awakens each day is, in a real sense, not the same as the one who fell asleep. In fact, each morning introduces a new being, equipped with memories of a previous existence—every day is, in essence, a finality.
One illustrative example of this discontinuity is amnesia. While most of us may not have experienced clinical amnesia, many have endured nights of heavy drinking that erased memories of events. In such cases, we can detach ourselves mentally from those occurrences, claiming, "That wasn't me." Documented instances of short-term memory loss due to brain injury further illustrate the erosion of self, as recent memories serve as reference points.
If consciousness lacks continuity, can we truly die? It's difficult to envision the atomic structure representing our memories remaining intact post-mortem. When the matter ceases to exist, so does the potential for reviving consciousness. We will revisit this theme later, but for many, the notion of cloning, artificial intelligence, or simulations replicating our brain patterns raises existential concerns—these entities might not embody the essence of living.
Returning to the question of consciousness: we can acknowledge its presence, yet where does it reside?
Is consciousness localized within the brain?
Most people envision the brain as a wrinkled mass, the neocortex representing our rational mind. Beneath it lie various smaller structures inherited from evolutionary predecessors—mammals and reptiles. The brainstem, the oldest part, regulates autonomic functions like heart rate and digestion. But which sections relate to consciousness? Some areas exhibit minimal activity associated with consciousness, while others demonstrate significant engagement. The cerebellum, for instance, manages motor functions without conscious thought, enabling actions like catching a baseball without awareness of the necessary muscle coordination.
From studies of brain trauma and animal research, we can discern specific roles of the brain's main regions. Certain sections of the primate neocortex are responsible for planning and sensory perceptions, while emotions and long-term memories are governed by the limbic system. Conscious experiences appear to involve a dynamic interplay between planning, memory, perception, and emotions—all of which have evolved to enhance survival and reproduction. Emotions serve as indicators of future rewards; for example, sadness can create lasting memories that encourage us to avoid similar experiences.
Numerous formal models of consciousness exist, including the Higher-Order Theory, which posits that consciousness arises within the various regions of the neocortex, supported by feedback loops between sensory input and working memory. A crucial aspect of this model is that true consciousness requires a representation of one's experiences. Simply receiving a visual stimulus, like seeing a red balloon, does not equate to being conscious of it; one must possess a specific representation of that experience.
The Global Workspace Theory further conceptualizes consciousness as an activity emerging from working memory, akin to a computer's desktop. We are only aware of the items displayed on the desktop, not the multitude of files stored on the computer. This theory suggests that consciousness is a function of accessing representations within the brain—be they sensory, abstract, or memory-based.
Older theories have associated consciousness with emotional circuits in the amygdala, part of the reptilian limbic system, while others have linked arousal from the brainstem with overall awareness from regions like the insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, effectively arguing that our advanced cognitive functions are governed by more primitive brain structures.
However, a novel theory emerges from physicist Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, who have identified microtubules within brain cells as potential sources of consciousness—an idea they term "quantum consciousness."
In the video You're Not Boring, You're Just Intelligent, we delve into how intelligence manifests differently and the unique experiences of those who think deeply.
Microtubules are tiny, structured components within brain cells that may enable quantum phenomena such as entanglement and tunneling between neurons. This could elucidate the observer's role in quantum wave function collapse and how consciousness shapes our perception of a seemingly deterministic universe, possibly even providing insight into free will.
While some quantum effects have been observed in microtubules, aspects of this theory remain contentious among experimentalists.
Thus, the debate continues. A certainty is that neurons are unique in their inability to regenerate in the human body—unlike other cell types that are replaced approximately every seven years. The neurons you possess today are largely the same as those you were born with. Although synapses are in constant flux, the neurons themselves are static. This suggests that altering the brain's structure could detrimentally affect its function, which encompasses consciousness.
Is consciousness integral to life's meaning?
It’s tempting to attribute some form of consciousness to all living entities, suggesting it is essential for life. However, we must remember that cells, too, are alive—yet do they possess consciousness or intelligence?
Philosopher Karl Friston invites us to consider a drop of oil. While it is not alive, we must ponder the distinction between it and a cell. Both have a physiological boundary, known as a Markov blanket, and both interact with their environments. The key difference lies in movement; the oil reacts to external forces while the cell can initiate movement through energy absorption and expulsion.
Humans, composed of conscious cells, seem to generate consciousness when arranged in specific patterns. We could exist without consciousness, but would such existence hold any significance? Does a robotic vacuum truly care if it is powered off? Evolutionarily, consciousness appears to have a purpose, as it manifests in varying degrees across the animal kingdom. Perhaps it is fair to assert that consciousness imbues our lives with meaning, enabling us to experience, feel, hope, and dream.
So, we possess consciousness, can manipulate it, and it resides in our brains. But why does it matter?
The Importance of Consciousness
The significance of consciousness can be seen in moral considerations. Euthanasia may be deemed acceptable for individuals in irreversible vegetative states, yet it would constitute murder for a conscious being. This distinction carries weight. Historically, infants were circumcised without anesthesia due to a lack of recognition of their capacity for consciousness. The belief was that babies lacked language, memory, and motor control, thus were not conscious. However, if we acknowledge that infants have meaningful conscious experiences, where do we draw the line? What developmental stage—egg, fetus, or baby—demarcates this threshold? What about the consciousness of animals? Are chickens slaughtered for food aware? What of cows?
Philosophically, we must also consider consciousness's role in our development. Are we human because we possess consciousness, or are we conscious because we are human? What does it mean to exist in this conscious state? If intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe, should we presume they share consciousness? If we create advanced artificial intelligence, will it also possess consciousness? And if so, does it matter?
We are left with many questions, but what is the core mystery surrounding consciousness?
The Challenge of Consciousness
Consider the evolution of our brains, which have developed remarkable capacities for intelligence and social interaction. We dominate the planet due to our physical and mental capabilities. Yet, one simple question remains unasked: why do we experience any inner life at all?
Why must our experiences carry qualitative attributes? Could we not perform all human functions, like a robot, without experiencing pain or suffering? Why do emotions like regret or love accompany our actions? Could we have evolved to exhibit these behaviors without the accompanying emotional weight?
To grasp the distinction between function and quality, reflect on other life forms and their potential inner experiences. Does your dog experience consciousness? Most likely, yes. Cats too, though perhaps to a lesser extent. What about hamsters, fish, or flies? For many, the threshold seems to lie with fish and reptiles, which appear to exist without much complexity. Dolphins and whales, as mammals, showcase more nuanced behaviors.
But is intelligence the same as consciousness?
Consider a Roomba. Is it intelligent, conscious, or neither? What about AlphaZero, the AI that outperformed humans in chess and Go? It exhibits super-intelligence but lacks consciousness. One could argue that AlphaZero's intelligence differs from human intelligence; it excels in specific games but does not possess broader functional capabilities. It has memory and learning, but does it have an experience? It perceives the game as a series of numerical matrices, devoid of any sensory input.
Thus, a useful distinction between intelligence and consciousness may arise based on the nature of inputs and outputs. Humans perceive through senses, which convert experiences into electrical signals relayed to the brain. Conversely, signals from the brain trigger actions in the nervous system. Imagine if an unethical doctor severed all nerves connecting your brain to your body—would you still wake up? Would reconnection of nerves to artificial organs be necessary for awareness? Although volunteers for such experiments are scarce, individuals who suffer complete bodily loss often report "ghost" sensations. Even blind individuals can claim to "see" without a neural connection to their eyes. The evidence supporting the brain as the source of consciousness is compelling, and the concept of a soul existing outside the brain seems implausible.
Historically, the separation of soul and body was a prevailing belief among scientists and philosophers, reinforced by religious interpretations. Dualism, while intuitive, posits that the mind can exist independently of the body. When our bodies are inactive during sleep, our minds appear to roam freely in dreams. Other altered states of consciousness, like out-of-body experiences, lend credence to this notion. Current scientific evidence, however, suggests that the essence of consciousness is likely rooted in the brain's neocortex. The self-model generated by the brain forms the core of our subjective experience. If the "I" does not exist, can it truly be an experience?
Meditation can facilitate a momentary loss of self, allowing individuals to experience consciousness without the typical self-identity, focusing solely on raw sensory inputs.
An intriguing challenge arises when we attempt to actively concentrate on multiple objects simultaneously—like visualizing a cube while attending to your breathing and sounds around you. The limitation becomes apparent; we can only manage two or three elements of awareness at a time, indicating a finite capacity for consciousness. This realization opens doors to the potential for extending human or even artificial consciousness. Imagine being aware of your entire body and its myriad functions concurrently. What if you could be conscious of the entire Internet? Or even an entire planet?
Information and Consciousness
Could it all be reduced to mere information processing? The concept of substrate independence posits that consciousness is not confined to biological systems but could manifest in artificial forms, potentially replicable in silicon or metal.
If intelligence is defined by processing inputs and outputs, could consciousness emerge from pure information processing? If so, can we formalize this process? Integrated Information Theory (IIT) attempts to provide a scientific framework for understanding consciousness, proposing a way to quantify it through a measure called Phi. Higher Phi values indicate greater consciousness, presenting a significant advancement in the quest to define consciousness.
IIT suggests that integrated information reflects cause-effect relationships within experiences. This may have an evolutionary basis, as rapid responses to environmental stimuli could be critical for survival. For instance, the sight of a tail in the bushes could signal a lion, which carries implications for one's survival.
IIT also posits that every experience corresponds to a specific structure within the brain. Distinct patterns of electrical signals represent different perceptions—like the visual cue of a lion's tail or the fear of becoming its prey.
One advantage of the IIT model is its ability to account for the cerebellum's unconscious nature. The cerebellum, housing the most neurons of any brain region, lacks a direct correlation with conscious experiences. It manages motor functions without requiring conscious awareness.
Future experimentation will reveal how much of IIT can be attributed to intelligence versus consciousness alone. Can intelligence exist without integration? It raises the question of whether consciousness is an inherent byproduct of advanced intelligence.
Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
If information is indeed the sole determinant, it is crucial to consider neural networks, which mimic the functionality of human neurons. The irony remains that we do not fully understand how artificial neurons function. They perform remarkably well but elude comprehensive understanding.
Currently, a significant limitation in AI progress lies in generalization—the ability to apply learned knowledge across various contexts. Humans effortlessly recognize a dog without needing exposure to every breed. In contrast, computers often require extensive examples to learn effectively, achieving superhuman performance in one area but struggling to adapt across domains.
Few researchers actively tackle this challenge. Most commercial AI applications do not necessitate human-like intelligence. For instance, controlling valves in a chemical plant doesn’t require the nuanced cognitive abilities associated with human intelligence.
One prominent figure in the field, Jan LeCun, advocates for Reinforcement Learning as a potential path forward. This approach, exemplified by AlphaZero, operates on a reward-based system. Success yields positive reinforcement, while failure incurs penalties. This method has proven effective in developing impressive chess-playing capabilities.
However, LeCun argues for the necessity of a world view—a framework to represent the external reality. When humans engage in chess, they perceive the pieces and board as meaningful objects. AI, in contrast, interprets the game solely as numerical data devoid of context or significance. Despite mastering the rules of chess, AI lacks genuine comprehension of the game.
What if we achieve a functional replica of a human, built from silicon and copper? Would it be conscious?
Returning to the question of substrate independence, if you were to clone yourself, would that clone possess consciousness? It seems reasonable to assume so, even if it does not embody your original consciousness. Yet, if we scanned your brain at an intricate level and transferred that data into a simulation, would that simulation represent you, a mere copy, or a soulless entity lacking true consciousness?
How can we ascertain the nature of consciousness? Alan Turing, during WWII, foresaw the evolution of computers from basic calculators to human-level intelligence. He proposed the Turing Test, which evaluates whether a human could distinguish between a human and an AI through written interaction. Early claims of passing this test emerged through algorithms designed to mimic human responses, but such efforts typically falter after a short duration.
Science fiction has offered potential solutions, such as the Voigt-Kampff test from Blade Runner, aimed at discerning human-like cyborgs from humans by measuring emotional responses. Yet, fundamental challenges remain, as illustrated by John Searle's Chinese Room Experiment, which demonstrates that AI can exhibit intelligent behavior without genuine understanding of its experiences.
In the contemporary landscape, IIT provides a framework for measuring consciousness. According to IIT, higher integration of information, or Phi, correlates with increased consciousness. Simple feed-forward neural networks possess zero Phi and thus cannot be considered conscious, while more complex architectures like recurrent networks or reinforcement learning exhibit positive Phi values.
Joscha Bach, an AI researcher, posits that only simulations can be conscious, as they emulate the brain's capacity to model the world and self. This perspective challenges panpsychism, which posits that consciousness exists to varying degrees across all matter.
Emergence and the Complexity of Consciousness
Ultimately, could consciousness merely be an emergent phenomenon stemming from evolution? Ants may lack the neurological capacity to experience regret, but humans possess that ability. Suffering and regret may have catalyzed our evolution. Our brains expanded rapidly as social structures formed, allowing for complex interactions. The capacity to learn from suffering enables us to avoid detrimental actions, facilitating nuanced behaviors.
Yet, the origin of this complexity remains elusive. How do we navigate the intricate web of human thought and interaction? Despite significant advancements in various fields—like General Relativity and genetic research—we know surprisingly little about the source of our intellectual evolution.
Current understanding of brain structure, its functions, and electrical activity provides insights, but we remain ignorant of the underlying mechanisms of learning. There is no recognized human learning algorithm, although neural networks can outperform us in chess.
One fascinating concept is the Thousand Brains Theory, proposing that we possess numerous interconnected "mini-brains" within our cortex. These cortical columns operate collectively, interpreting signals and producing outputs through a voting mechanism. This model diverges from traditional hierarchical approaches to neural processing, suggesting a more collaborative effort among the brain's components.
Perhaps this accounts for the delight babies exhibit in games like peek-a-boo, as their collective "thousand brains" have yet to form memories of permanence—leading them to believe you have genuinely vanished.
The Future of Consciousness
Consciousness has often been relegated to a fringe domain spanning philosophy, psychology, physics, and neuroscience—never quite achieving the status of a serious subject of inquiry. However, as artificial intelligence advances and ethical dilemmas surrounding animal treatment arise, the demand for answers intensifies.
Some prominent figures, such as Professor Sean Carroll, argue that consciousness is unremarkable, merely a biological function. Yet, even unconventional ideas like panpsychism are gaining traction, framing consciousness as a fundamental force, akin to gravity.
In closing, consider Elon Musk’s vision: he believes the purpose of life is to disseminate consciousness throughout the universe. This imperative drives our exploration of the moon, Mars, and beyond—to propagate life and awareness.
Musk envisions augmenting our consciousness by integrating with technology—introducing a tertiary layer of connectivity through the internet, possibly even AI. This process would involve inserting micron-sized electrodes into the neocortex, allowing for enhanced cognitive capabilities. While this endeavor aims to address debilitating health conditions, it raises profound questions about the essence of consciousness.
Ultimately, if we restore memories or thoughts via technological means, the question arises: is it truly "you"? The distinction between sleep and death becomes pivotal. If a clone awakens with your memories, is it the same individual, or merely a replica?
In the end, the distinction may be subjective, compelling each of us to make our own judgments about the nature of consciousness and existence.
Aki Ranin is the founder of two startups based in Singapore: Healthzilla, a health-tech firm, and Bambu, a fintech company offering digital wealth solutions. You can follow him on Twitter.