Rethinking Victimization: A New Perspective on Vulnerability
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Victimization
During my time at the clinical psychology faculty, as I embarked on my first term paper concerning the psychological effects of violence on women, I encountered a compelling concept: "victimization." This notion suggested that violence is not arbitrary but instead is directed towards individuals who somehow "draw" such circumstances to themselves. I vividly recall discussing this with my supervisor, who had considerable experience in a crisis center for female survivors of violence. She indicated that, based on her experience, she could often identify potential victims by observing their demeanor—how they carried themselves, their gaze, or their gait. Although this revelation was startling, it also presented an opportunity for therapeutic work. If certain traits could signify a potential victim, therapists could focus on these aspects in counseling—exploring their origins and addressing them, thereby potentially preventing future harm.
However, the situation proved to be more complex. Later, I was introduced to feminist psychotherapy, which critiques the notion of victimization as a form of victim blaming and magical thinking. This perspective suggests that the concept implicitly places blame on the victim, implying they somehow irrationally "attracted" the aggressor. It is essential to recognize that one cannot categorize individuals who experience violence into specific types. Various circumstances can leave individuals vulnerable, encompassing not only sexual violence but violence in a broader context. According to feminist therapy, the responsibility for violence lies solely with the aggressor; victims should not and cannot be held accountable for the crimes committed against them.
Section 1.1: The Shift in Therapeutic Approach
The rejection of the idea of "victimization" necessitates a reevaluation of therapeutic practices and strategies. When addressing instances of violence, the topic of guilt frequently arises. Some clients internalize blame for their experiences, while others face societal condemnation. It is natural for victims to grapple with feelings of guilt at certain stages in processing trauma, as they may redirect their anger towards the aggressor back onto themselves to regain a sense of control. However, in the long run, this approach is counterproductive, as it neither alters the past nor facilitates effective trauma resolution.
In older therapeutic models, the concept of "victimization" allowed for the transformation of guilt into a sense of responsibility. Yet, the reality of violent situations is that victims cannot be held accountable. Legal responsibility falls to the perpetrator. Nevertheless, one must consider the myriad factors leading up to the incident that influenced the outcome. For instance, a victim might be in a state of vulnerability due to fatigue, lack of experience in recognizing danger, or simply being in an unfortunate location at the wrong time. These elements are examined not to assign blame but to thoroughly understand and resolve the context of the incident. Importantly, these factors are unrelated to the personality traits of the victim and do not imply guilt, as no circumstances justify violence against anyone.
Subsection 1.1.1: Moving Towards Vulnerability
Thus, "victimization" should not be perceived as a characteristic of the individual or a personal responsibility for the actions of others. A more constructive approach in psychotherapy would be to adopt the concept of "situational vulnerability," acknowledging that under certain conditions, anyone can be susceptible. Unlike "victimization," vulnerability does not assign blame to the individual who has experienced violence. Instead, it highlights the weaknesses that aggressors exploit, without absolving them of legal or moral accountability. Addressing vulnerability encourages discussions around safety, self-care, and available resources, which are crucial for individuals to derive meaning from their experiences and begin healing after trauma.
Chapter 2: Exploring the Impact of Victim Blaming
The first video, "Rethinking 'Don't Blame the Victim' | Dr. Ofer Zur," delves into the complexities of victim blaming, challenging societal perceptions and encouraging a more compassionate understanding of trauma.
The second video, "Psychology of Victim Blaming in Sexual Violence," explores the psychological dynamics behind victim blaming in cases of sexual violence, highlighting the detrimental effects this mindset has on survivors and society as a whole.